Home

Advertisement

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Just...WOW

  • Feb. 2nd, 2009 at 1:33 PM
White House: Now Under New Management
Ok so there are people actually believe that President Obama was elected because the masses were manipulated into voting for him? Wow! That's kinda "put on mah tin foil hatz so the gov'ment can't put stuff in mah brainz" crazy, isn't it? Well then again these people also probably thought Sarah Palin was the epitome of feminism, so yeah...woohoo whack-a-doodle!!

I mean seriously. Obama won, McCain lost. Ummm...stop being a sore loser and get over it?

Sorry, I about laughed myself to tears of this one. Yowza.

Comments

( 8 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]amavia wrote:
Feb. 2nd, 2009 07:07 pm (UTC)
O.o



(btw, I made the same icon because it's awesome. Haven't uploaded/used it yet, though....)

[info]arianasilver wrote:
Feb. 2nd, 2009 07:33 pm (UTC)
O.o

That was the same face I made...before I busted out laughing. I showed this forum post to a staunch Repub that voted McCain and he was like "Uhhh...what??" and just doubled over laughing. That's just umm. Padded room?
(Anonymous) wrote:
Feb. 2nd, 2009 07:10 pm (UTC)
I think pat is entirely out of line.--AmyC
[info]arianasilver wrote:
Feb. 2nd, 2009 07:32 pm (UTC)
I mean just...wow! Hey if she didn't want someone to point out that's a little whack-a-doodle she shouldn't have said it. Geez louise!
(Anonymous) wrote:
Feb. 2nd, 2009 07:38 pm (UTC)
you should head over to her blog...she had more to say on the topic...
[info]arianasilver wrote:
Feb. 2nd, 2009 07:44 pm (UTC)
is it the blog linked from her profile?
[info]lurfmonkey wrote:
Feb. 2nd, 2009 07:49 pm (UTC)
It's not entirely crazy. The masses can be manipulated. In the last election, people voted on fear - fear that gays would marry, fear that terrorists would run wild with a Democrat as president, fear that Mexicans would storm our borders and take all the good jobs, fear that abortions would be as common as births, etc. McCain also ran on a platform of fear. Unfortunately for him, it didn't work. Although I definitely believe Obama was the right choice, I think expectations of him are way too high. A platform of hope and change could also be considered manipulation, even though it's in a positive sense.

However, I don't think it was enough manipulation to say he won because of it. It was too much of a landslide for that. There was plenty of information from both sides for people to make an informed decision. I think Kerry lost because he wasn't in the spotlight long enough, so people didn't know enough about him and went with who they knew. The prolonged nomination process kept Obama in your face whether you liked it or not, whereas Kerry seemed to fall off the face of the earth between his nomination and the debates.
[info]arianasilver wrote:
Feb. 2nd, 2009 07:52 pm (UTC)
"However, I don't think it was enough manipulation to say he won because of it."

That's my thing. From the comment the person made, it was made to sound along the lines of "conspiracy! conspiracy!"
( 8 comments — Leave a comment )